Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMoore, Russell D.
dc.contributor.advisorHaykin, Michael A. G.
dc.contributor.authorPellum, Jeremy
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-05T17:45:42Z
dc.date.available2019-06-05T17:45:42Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-02
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10392/5799
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation presents Joseph Stennett and Gilbert Burnet as two preachers of providence during and after the Glorious Revolution, arguing that Joseph Stennett used the doctrine of providence in manner consistent with his self-professed Baptist convictions while Gilbert Burnet did not use of the doctrine of providence in a manner consistent with his self-professed, pre-1688 Anglican convictions—particularly the doctrine of passive obedience. Chapter 2 frames the whole of the dissertation by surveying the prevalence of providentialist language among English Protestants in the aftermath of the Glorious Revolution. Chapter 3 examines Stennett’s consistent understanding and use of providentialist language by the witness of his extant works. Chapters 4 and 5 examine Burnet’s inconsistent use of providentialist rhetoric in light of his published convictions concerning passive obedience. Chapter 6 provides a brief concluding comparison of Stennett and Burnet’s use of providentialist language, and chapter 6 presents Stennett as a model worthy of emulation.en_US
dc.subject.lcshStennett, Joseph, 1663-1713en_US
dc.subject.lcshBurnet, Gilbert, 1643-1715en_US
dc.subject.lcshProvidence and government of Goden_US
dc.subject.lcshGrace (Theology)en_US
dc.titleThe Language of Providence in the Lives of Joseph Stennett and Gilbert Burneten_US
dc.typeElectronic dissertationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.contributor.committeeWright, Shawn D.
dc.type.qualificationnamePh.D.en_US
dc.publisher.institutionSouthern Baptist Theological Seminaryen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Theology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record