Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWilsey, John D.
dc.contributor.authorBeach, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-31T20:28:37Z
dc.date.available2022-05-31T20:28:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10392/6771
dc.descriptionThis work is embargoed by the author until 09/02/2023.
dc.description.abstractWhile historians disagree about many different aspects of the Westminster Assembly (1643–1653), the current historiography is united in seeing the gathering and its members as staunchly anti-Catholic. However, a largely overlooked debate in the Assembly reveals a surprising discussion—some divines showed sympathy with the distinctly Roman Catholic doctrine of consilia evangelica that undergirded works of supererogation and that had been condemned by the magisterial reformers. A careful reading of the Assembly minutes shows that views on consilia correlated with the positions of some Assembly divines on critical issues such as salvation and good works. The debate over consilia at Westminster is the tip of an iceberg capable of yielding fresh and unexpected insights into three important and interconnected fields of historiography: (1) the place of consilia amongst Protestantism, (2) the reach of Roman Catholicism within the Assembly, and (3) the extent of Roman Catholic influence in English Puritanism.en_US
dc.subjectconsilia evangelicaen_US
dc.subjectEnglish puritanismen_US
dc.subjectWestminster Assemblyen_US
dc.titleConsilia: Catholic Inroads at the Puritan Anti-Catholic Westminster Assemblyen_US
dc.typeElectronic thesisen_US
dc.typeText
dc.embargo.liftdate2023-09-02T00:00:00Z
dc.type.qualificationnameTh.M.en_US
dc.publisher.institutionSouthern Baptist Theological Seminaryen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Theology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record