View Item 
  •   Boyce Digital Repository Home
  • Dissertations, Theses, and Projects
  • Open Access Dissertations and Theses
  • View Item
  •   Boyce Digital Repository Home
  • Dissertations, Theses, and Projects
  • Open Access Dissertations and Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

All Digital CollectionsCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Paul and Allegory: Galatians 4:21–31 Revisited

Thumbnail
View/Open
Ford_sbts_0207D_10751.pdf (1.671Mb)
Date
2022-11-11
Author
Ford, John Jarrett
Advisor
Schreiner, Thomas R.
Metadata
Show full item record
Subject
Paul, the Apostle, Saint
Philo, of Alexandria. De congressu eruditionis gratia
Bible. Galatians IV, 21-31--Criticism, interpretation, etc.
Bible--Allegorical interpretations--History
Bible--Hermeneutics
Abstract
Those engaged in modern hermeneutical debates have begun to look afresh at the apostles for guidance concerning how one should read the Bible. How did the apostles read, and do their methods match those used in modern biblical scholarship? Amongst the texts discussed in this conversation, Galatians 4:21–31 stands out. Paul’s methods seem foreign to modern minds, and he even seems to flag his reading as an allegory, leading many to see in this text a justification for allegorical hermeneutics. This dissertation attempts to address the question “was Paul allegorizing?" by arguing that Paul was not allegorizing because Paul was not doing what Philo, the allegorical exemplar of the first century, was doing. This argument is built on the following four pieces: First, this dissertation provides a selective survey of modern scholarship on the issue, showing that Philo serves as the allegorical exemplar of the first century and, consequently, as a baseline for figuring what “allegory” was. Second, it analyzes what is implied by the phrase ἅτινά ἐστιν ἀλληγορούμενα in Galatians 4:24 by a broad study of how the verb ἀλληγορέω functioned in the first century, concluding that Paul meant little more than “these things are metaphorical.” Third, it provides a careful reading of Philo’s treatise De congressu eruditionis gratia, suggesting that Philo’s hermeneutic comprised four attributes: (1) problem solving, (2) etymology, (3) numerology, and (4) arbitrariness. Fourth, it attempts to explain how Paul moved from Sarah and Hagar to the present and heavenly Jerusalems through a detailed analysis of the so-called allegorical pericope found in Galatians 4:21–31 and the Old Testament texts on which this pericope depends (i.e., Gen 16–21 and Isa 54:1). Fourth and finally, it compares this interpretive scheme to that of Philo.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10392/6983
Collections
  • Open Access Dissertations and Theses

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
DSpace Express is a service operated by 
Atmire NV